Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
About us
My Preferences 


This article has been cited by
1The Effect of Cognitive Control on Different Types of Auditory Distraction
Raoul Bell,Jan P. Röer,John E. Marsh,Dunja Storch,Axel Buchner
Experimental Psychology.2017;64(5)359
2Two simultaneous talkers distract more than one in simulated multi-talker environments, regardless of overall sound levels typical of open-plan offices
Manuj Yadav,Densil Cabrera
Applied Acoustics.2019;148(5)46
3The effects of masking sound and signal-to-noise ratio on work performance in Chinese open-plan offices
Yuanyuan Zhang,Dayi Ou,Shengxian Kang
Applied Acoustics.2021;172(5)107657
4Are single-word picture naming assessments a valid measure of word retrieval in connected speech?
Catherine Mason,Lyndsey Nickels
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2022;24(1)97
5Boundaries of semantic distraction: Dominance and lexicality act at retrieval
John E. Marsh,Nick Perham,Patrik Sörqvist,Dylan M. Jones
Memory & Cognition.2014;42(8)1285
6Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics
Helena Jahncke,Valtteri Hongisto,Petra Virjonen
Applied Acoustics.2013;74(3)307
7Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent postcategorical features?
John E. Marsh,Jan P. Röer,Raoul Bell,Axel Buchner
PsyCh Journal.2014;3(1)58
8Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations
Bjørn Sætrevik,Patrik Sörqvist
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.2015;56(1)1
9Auditory Distraction During Reading: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of a Continuing Controversy
Martin R. Vasilev,Julie A. Kirkby,Bernhard Angele
Perspectives on Psychological Science.2018;13(5)567
10Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing
John E. Marsh,Robert Ljung,Anatole Nöstl,Emma Threadgold,Tom A. Campbell
Frontiers in Psychology.2015;6(5)567
11The susceptibility of compound remote associate problems to disruption by irrelevant sound: a Window onto the component processes underpinning creative cognition?
John E. Marsh,Emma Threadgold,Melissa E. Barker,Damien Litchfield,Federica Degno,Linden J. Ball
Journal of Cognitive Psychology.2021;33(6-7)793
12Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing
Marijke Keus van de Poll,Patrik Sörqvist
Applied Cognitive Psychology.2016;30(3)430
13How Much Does Irrelevant Speech Impair Employees' Work Performance in Open-Plan Offices?
Helena Jahncke
Noise & Vibration Worldwide.2013;44(9)10
14The influence of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right auditory cortex on interference effects in memory for melodies
Nora K. Schaal,Stefanie Kloos,Bettina Pollok,Steffen A. Herff
Brain and Cognition.2021;154(9)105798
15Disruption of writing by background speech: The role of speech transmission index
Marijke Keus van de Poll,Robert Ljung,Johan Odelius,Patrik Sörqvist
Applied Acoustics.2014;81(9)15
16Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account
Robert W. Hughes
PsyCh Journal.2014;3(1)30
17Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.2012;53(2)97
18Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall
Jan P. Röer,Raoul Bell,Axel Buchner
Memory & Cognition.2014;42(4)609
19Sound Masking in Büroumgebungen
Tobias Renz,Philip Leistner,Andreas Liebl
20Unmasking the effects of masking on performance: The potential of multiple-voice masking in the office environment
Marijke Keus van de Poll,Johannes Carlsson,John E. Marsh,Robert Ljung,Johan Odelius,Sabine J. Schlittmeier,Gunilla Sundin,Patrik Sörqvist
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.2015;138(2)807
21The effects of speech intelligibility and temporal–spectral variability on performance and annoyance ratings
Andreas Liebl,Alexander Assfalg,Sabine J. Schlittmeier
Applied Acoustics.2016;110(2)170
22Effects of the location of sound masking loudspeakers on cognitive performance in open-plan offices: Local sound masking is as efficient as conventional sound masking
Tobias Renz,Philip Leistner,Andreas Liebl
Applied Acoustics.2018;139(2)24
23Auditory distraction in open-plan study environments: Effects of background speech and reverberation time on a collaboration task
Ella Braat-Eggen,Marijke Keus v.d. Poll,Maarten Hornikx,Armin Kohlrausch
Applied Acoustics.2019;154(2)148
24Irrelevant speech effects with locally time-reversed speech: Native vs non-native language
Kazuo Ueda,Yoshitaka Nakajima,Florian Kattner,Wolfgang Ellermeier
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.2019;145(6)3686
25Trouble articulating the right words: Evidence for a response-exclusion account of distraction during semantic fluency
John E. Marsh,Jessica C. Crawford,Lea K. Pilgrim,Patrik Sörqvist,Robert W. Hughes
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.2017;58(5)367
26Distraction by Auditory Categorical Deviations Is Unrelated to Working Memory Capacity: Further Evidence of a Distinction between Acoustic and Categorical Deviation Effects
Katherine Labonté,John E. Marsh,François Vachon
Auditory Perception & Cognition.2021;4(3-4)139
27Noise disturbance in open-plan study environments: a field study on noise sources, student tasks and room acoustic parameters
P. Ella Braat-Eggen,Anne van Heijst,Maarten Hornikx,Armin Kohlrausch
28The effect of background speech on attentive sound processing: A pupil dilation study
Paula Ríos-López,Andreas Widmann,Aurelie Bidet-Caulet,Nicole Wetzel
International Journal of Psychophysiology.2022;174(9)47
29The relation between the intelligibility of irrelevant speech and cognitive performance—A revised model based on laboratory studies
Annu Haapakangas,Valtteri Hongisto,Andreas Liebl
Indoor Air.2020;30(6)1130