| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||4029 |
| Printed||262 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||22 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
|Year : 2022
: 24 | Issue : 114 | Page
|Noise Pollution in Intensive Care Unit: A Hidden Enemy affecting the Physical and Mental Health of Patients and Caregivers
Jagriti Pal1, Manish Taywade2, Rajni Pal3, Divya Sethi4
1 All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhubaneswar, Odisha; Maharaja Agrasen Nursing College, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India
2 Department of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
3 All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
4 All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhubaneswar, Odisha; Gandhi Dham, Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, India
Click here for correspondence address
|Date of Submission||17-Dec-2021|
|Date of Decision||17-Jan-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||01-Apr-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||16-Sep-2022|
Background Noise in intensive care units (ICUs) has always been a problem, but noise above the recommended range affects not only the patient but staff as well. It is clear that some noise in the ICU is inevitable, but exceeding the normal range brings various physiologic and psychologic changes, which directly affect health. This review presents a synthesis of noise sources in the ICU and the potential interventions designed to attenuate noise and protect patients.
Materials and Methods An extensive literature search, using electronic databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Research gate to understand the noise in ICU, effects of noise, and noise reduction interventions were undertaken.
Results Findings were such as noise enhances the release of cortisol, increases oxygen consumption, increases sleep disturbances, increases the need for analgesia and sedation, and disrupts circadian rhythm. Many studies reported that measurement was always higher despite implementing noise reduction interventions.
Conclusions ICU survivors always recall their memories, and for them, ICU admission becomes a negative experience for life. However, the sustainability of any single intervention did not show awe-inspiring results, whereas a bundle kind of interventions did show some effects. However, high-quality evidence demonstrating the benefit of any intervention on patient outcomes is still lacking.
Keywords: Health, health professionals, intensive care unit, intervention, noise, noise control, noise prevention, patients
|How to cite this article:|
Pal J, Taywade M, Pal R, Sethi D. Noise Pollution in Intensive Care Unit: A Hidden Enemy affecting the Physical and Mental Health of Patients and Caregivers. Noise Health 2022;24:130-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Pal J, Taywade M, Pal R, Sethi D. Noise Pollution in Intensive Care Unit: A Hidden Enemy affecting the Physical and Mental Health of Patients and Caregivers. Noise Health [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Dec 10];24:130-6. Available from: https://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2022/24/114/130/356134
| Introduction|| |
Noise pollution is always an essential concern to humankind on this planet. Control of environmental noise has been a priority of scientists and researchers across. The effect of noise has long-term consequences for health.,,
Noise is undoubtedly not a wanted sound, but the fact is that what is noise to one person may not be the same for another one. Studies indicate that sound levels in hospitals have increased during the past 50 years and exceed World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for community noise.,, The extent of the noise problem is vast across the globe.
| Aim|| |
The aim of this review article was that, even after numerous publications in this field, whether it is about the source of noise, the impact of noise on patients, or the noise reduction strategies. However still, the problem persists so far. In our review, we focus on sources of noise in intensive care unit (ICU), its effects on patients and staff, which interventions are helpful, expensive and cost-effective, to reduce and protect the patients from noise.
| Noise in intensive care|| |
Despite an increased emphasis on the need for noise reduction in intensive care, several studies published in the past few years have found that sound levels in the ICU continue to exceed WHO noise recommendations.,,, An appreciation of how quiet the ICU should aid in the interpretation of noise research. The WHO guidelines state that the average sound level should not exceed 30 dB in general hospital areas and 35 dB in rooms where patients are kept or observed; the maximum sound level indoors should not exceed 40 dB during the night.
The Environmental Protection Agency recommends that hospital noise levels not exceed an average of 45 dB during the day and 35 dB at night. Meeting these goals in practical and clinical situations is very challenging. According to these recommendations, the health-care staff has to whisper, which is impossible and noise from equipment, alarms, etc., further adds to the noise levels.
It is well known that ICU is for critically sick patients, utmost need multiple treatments at a given time; for example, when the IV infusion pump is in use, simultaneously patient is on a ventilator and attached with the monitor as well, and like that so, many other patients are there. Hence, these devices have safety alarms, and they beep for every patient, so sometimes ICU can be as noisy as some community halls.
A systematic review of 29 studies related to noise in the ICU reported that the significant chunks of noise were staff conversations, equipment alarms, electronic devices, opening and shutting the doors, walking people here and there, moving and shifting things, or objects, caregiver activities. Another study was performed in five ICUs and reported that noise levels are more than 45 decibels most of the time; it rarely came to less than 45.
Suppose we talk about the disturbed sleeping pattern in ICU mostly, studies have reported that staff conversations were the most common factor causing a sleeping disturbance. Staff conversations are an unavoidable factor, and even the outcome of all the noise reduction strategies has been limited in this area.
Many studies have reported that noise from nursing procedures is one of the most disturbing factors. If the nursing care is performed at night or in the early morning, it causes alterations in the sleep-wake rhythm, ultimately, circadian rhythm disruption. [Table 1] summarizes a brief essence about noise sources and the effectiveness of noise reduction strategies.
|Table 1 Sources of noise and effectiveness of noise reduction strategies|
Click here to view
Sources of noise in ICU settings
A systematic review suggested that the noise levels increased at the highest level, so speech comprehension and communication are compromised. Critical-care areas in hospitals rely heavily on alarms and pagers to signal urgent situations. It is, therefore, unsurprising that observational studies on ICUs identify these as primary disruptive noise sources. Nearly 80% of disruptive noise sources are monitor or ventilator alarms and speech., However, a significant proportion of the noise does not require much attention for patient care. Almost 90% of alarms from physiologic monitors are “false positives,” with no patient benefit.
The shocking results of the above-stated studies are that most of the noise originates from specific areas such as the staff cafeteria near the ICU where conversations occur and nursing stations where handing and taking over the patients arise. These places are very close to the patient, although it cannot be denied that most of the communications are essential; yes, they do create noise in the ICU and in addition to this, equipment and devices near the patient are also there.
The alarming system designs in the devices are to stimulate the human senses. Still, the frequency range of these devices is equal to a baby’s scream or cry, which may help attract the staff’s attention but not for the patient’s comfort. The alarms designed to have default settings mean they can be adjusted routinely in high or low frequency and volumes, but in day-to-day clinical practice, it rarely occurs, and most of the time, alarms are high in volume and frequency.
Patients undergo various procedures such as admission, positioning, invasive tubes, intravenous line insertion, and ventilator setting in a surgical ICU. Other essential practices are medication orders, administration, pain control, and a close observation and assessment of the patient, so it requires a workforce. Thus, the result is “the noisy ICU.”
Alarm modification with the need but still the low-frequency and low-volume alarms make a health-care worker anxious because the patient is usually critical in ICUs. Due to this new modification, the chances of mishappenings and near-miss are significantly higher, so this problem requires a practical solution.
Effect of ICU generated noise on patients
There is no doubt that noise affects both health-care workers and patients. Still, on sick patients, the intensity of the effect is much higher because it brings many physiologic and psychologic disequilibrium, which further leads to cognitive and comprehensive dysfunction. These type of problems leads to ineffective communication and increase the chances of accidents. Incredibly the critically ill who have sleep disturbances due to noise and elderly patient who is having hearing difficulty, all these factors collectively hinder communication and poor understanding of their surrounding environment.
When critically ill patient stays in ICU, they have to go through various treatment modalities. The treatment various other precipitating factors in the ICU, bringing behavioral changes. The patient might develop delirium-like sleep disturbances due to noise; this sleep deficiency leads to many sequelae such as disrupted melatonin levels, circadian rhythm disruption, and disturbed neurocognition.
Noise-induced sleep disturbance
Critical-care patients are especially prone to delirium, as their regular circadian pattern of adrenocorticotropic hormone and melatonin levels is changed markedly by sepsis. It encourages a disturbance in sleep patterns leading to sleep during the day, reduced sleep at night, and general sleep fragmentation. During the stay in ICU, patients experience a variety of noises. Thus, the atmosphere creates a disturbance in their sleep, which is already fragmented. Due to that, hallucinations may occur during the transition from wakefulness into NREM sleep, and from NREM sleep to insomnia are a significant problem for critical-care patients. During the sleep phase, noise activates the inflammatory response and alters endothelial function. This oxidative stress damages vital organs’ vasculature and leads to various other clinical conditions.
As expected, several ICU noises have irritating perceptions. There is evidence that the degree of annoyance depends not solely on acoustical but also on nonacoustical features (e.g., unpredictability, timing). Especially sudden and loud alarming signals and staff-generated noises seem the most annoying for patients and health-care professionals.
Noise-induced cardiac and cerebral damage
European society of cardiology reported higher noise exposure could alter circadian rhythm, further leading to sympathetic nervous system activation. These changes alter the genetic expression of hematopoetic tissues and make them prone to endothelial dysfunction, endothelial damage. Posing the high risk of alteration of cardiovascular and neurologic disruptions.
Noise-induced altered mental status/delirium
Studies show that noise causes cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in the brain. Noise pollution has become a risk factor for depression, cognitive impairment, and neurodegenerative disorders. Factors are industrialization and urbanization. Exposure to noise influences the central nervous system leading to emotional stress, anxiety, cognitive, and memory defects. Previous studies have suggested that the Limbic system in the brain is involved in vigorous activities; the Amygdala and the Hippocampus are two of the main parts within the Limbic system that receives sensory information directly and indirectly from the central auditory system.
Noise can affect performance either by impairing information processing or by causing changes in strategic responses. In particular, noise increases general alertness or activation and attention. Noise can also reduce performance accuracy and working memory performance but not affect performance speed. Altered cognitive function leads to human error and subsequently increases accidents. This can ultimately lead to reduced performance and productivity.,
Noise-induced disrupted circadian rhythm
An inflammatory response often accompanies critical illness, which may mediate the recovery from illness., Interestingly, systemic inflammatory response markers, including temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure, hormones (cortisol, melatonin, leptin, prostaglandins), cytokines, white blood cells, and platelet counts, all display circadian rhythmicity. The circadian regulation of inflammatory response ensures appropriate timing and maintenance of the immune response. Any deviation to the regular circadian system, or a stressor to the circadian system at an inconvenient time, could alter the immune response and the recovery from injury. The circadian rhythm appears to be disrupted commonly in critically ill patients and it gets worse when a noise like other disturbing factors are there.
Increase need for analgesia and sedation
A study on anesthetic agents suggested that if the environmental influences such as noise, temperature, etc., are within the acceptable range, their requirement for sedation is likely less than the requirement needed for the disease process. On the contrary, another study supports the thought that noise levels maintained below the national recommendation may play no clinically significant role in patient sedation and analgesia requirements.
Hindrance in communication
Due to noise, impaired communication may occur; for example, look-alike sound-alike drugs look similar and sound similar in an emergency. There are very high chances of medication errors. The same is with the communication between nurses; their communication should be legible, clear because only due to some miscommunication safety of the patient might get compromised. During the nursing handovers, the noise level must be low so that chances of miscommunication are also on the more downside.
Effects on staff
Noise in ICUs has always been well above the recommended levels, which directly affects the patients or indirectly nurse’s job satisfaction and mental peace. Many studies on nurses’ satisfaction suggest that a nurse’s good mental status can improve quality patient care. Noise in the ICU is always above the normal range sometimes; the reason is staff shortage. If the nurse–patient ratio has exceeded indeed, it will lead to noise-creating situations, and ultimately, quality care is compromised.,,
A study performed on the staff in ICU has reported that noise-related burnout affects the team’s performance not only in the professional but also in personal life because noise-related burnout leads to irritation, disturbed mood, poor completion of tasks, and infuriation time. Indeed, coronary care patients have reported finding staff attitude much better in conditions with good acoustics. Higher background noise may impair communication between health-care workers and may lead to an elevation in speech amplitude. It has implications for patient confidentiality and may predispose to accidents due to a combination of impaired communication and poor concentration.
Noise reduction strategies
The effect of noise reduction strategies solely depends on the patient’s perception because tolerance and patience level differs from individual to individual. Some of them find the alarming sound a chance to see someone or a kind of stimulation. On the contrary, some find the noise annoying.
The following section summarizes the noise reduction strategies that have already come up and how successful and cost-effective they are in our Indian setting ICUs.
Few identified strategies
Multiple studies have reported that most of the noise comes from human behavior such as talking, movement, and taking and lifting of objects. Among noise reduction, behavioral modification and educational programs have been implemented to make the persons aware of the activities that create noise and motivate them to follow behavior modification and education consistently.,,
But such programs have failed to show consistent or dramatic results. Teaching sessions intended to minimize staff communication close to patients’ rooms could not reduce noise in ICUs.
Introduction of noise limiting guidelines
Some of the studies investigated issuing guidelines to reduce noise such as low-volume and low-frequency alarm, minimal nursing care at night time, switching off the radio, TV, mobile phones on silent mode, close all the doors, no or minimal conversation at night time. These strategies brought a slight noise reduction but were not effectively significant.,
A behavioral modification program
A study investigated the behavior modification program, which changes nursing and medical routines. The introduction of nondisturbance periods resulted in a reduction in disturbance activity and noise levels in a neuro-ICU. For behavioral modification programs to succeed, there needs to be enthusiasm from health-care staff for a project.
The design of ICUs and high-frequency oscillatory ventilators
The design of ICU may influence the noise by implementing architectural modifications such as making handover stations, and entrances should be away from the patient’s room, each patient has a single designated space, the ceiling of ICU rooms made up of sound-absorbing tiles. Efforts could also reduce noise production by purchasing equipment such as high-frequency oscillator ventilators.
Such strategies are not cost-effective because it is a complex and costly affair to apply structural changes in the existing ICU’s and repurchasing of the latest ventilators requires a lot of financial support. It may cost a health facility a lot.
Music interventions with earplugs
A study reported that earplugs with soothing ear music could also influence ICU-related noise. When patients recover from surgeries, it is a beneficial intervention to reduce pain, irritation, and promote rest. However, the outcome of these techniques might differ because different patients’ cognitive levels in different ICUs vary.
Music intervention with earplugs might be effective but not effective in the long run because the earplugs may harbor bacteria and can be a potential source of infection.
Repair of ICU equipment
A study reported that repairing all the malfunctioned equipment and devices in the ICU can significantly reduce noise.
Implementation of quiet time: noise-reduction strategy
This study reported that patients should be provided with their designated rest periods apart from their routine care and make sure that during that period, no disturbance should be there. The rationale of this strategy is quite interesting. It is used in patients to encourage sound sleep. Many physiologic disorders alter due to sleep disturbance and disrupted circadian rhythm, although it is impossible to alleviate all the noise from the ICU.
Night-time noise reduction bundle and a streamlined patient monitoring alarm profile
Bundles include switching off electronic items, silent mode phones, taking in whispering voices or not all taking, lowering the voice of the alarms, and a streamlined alarm profile for 2 weeks to significantly reduce the noise level.
Effects of white noise
[TAG:2]Noise is the most common factor of sleep disturbances. The white noise masks the other annoying sounds and improves sleep quality.[/TAG:2]
| Conclusion|| |
Reduction of noise efficiently, no single strategy can be helpful. Either it should be a combination of strategies, or the staff must modify the workflow. The working team has to do a significant chunk of noise reduction during staff conversations. Their behavior modification can bring desired changes. There must be a mixed intervention program to control the noise, engineering noise control, and architectural design strategies to mitigate excessive noise levels.
First draft: Jagriti Pal and Manish Taywade
Manuscript revision and a final version: Jagriti Pal and Manish Taywade
Concept, design, and writing manuscript: Jagriti Pal and Manish Taywade
Literature review: Divya Sethi, Rajni Pal, Jagriti Pal
The final manuscript was read and approved by all authors.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Busch-Vishniac IJ, West JE, Barnhill C, Hunter T, Orellana D, Chivukula R. Noise levels in Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:3629–45.
Elliott RM, McKinley SM, Eager D. A pilot study of sound levels in an Australian adult general intensive care unit. Noise Health 2010;12:26–36.
] [Full text]
Konkani A, Oakley B. Noise in hospital intensive care units - a critical review of a critical topic. J Crit Care 2012;27:522.e1–9.
Akansel N, Kaymakçi S. Effects of intensive care unit noise on patients: a study on coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:1581–90.
Cordova AC, Logishetty K, Fauerbach J, Price LA, Gibson BR, Milner SM. Noise levels in a burn intensive care unit. Burns 2013;39:44–8.
Darbyshire JL, Young JD. An investigation of sound levels on intensive care units with reference to the WHO guidelines. Crit Care 2013;17:R187.
Berglund Birgitta, Lindvall Thomas, Schwela Dietrich H, World Health Organization. Occupational and Environmental Health Team. (1999). Guidelines for community noise. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66217
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety. Washington, DC; 1974. http://www.nonoise.org/library/levels74/levels74
Busch‐Vishniac I, West JE, Kwon P, Dunn J. The challenges of noise control in hospitals. 14th International Conference on Sound and Vibration. Cairns, Australia, 2007: 1–13. http://toc.proceedings.com/17573webtoc.pdf
Delaney LJ, Currie MJ, Huang HC, Lopez V, Van Haren F. “They can rest at home”: an observational study of patients’ quality of sleep in an Australian hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:524.
Tegnestedt C, Günther A, Reichard A et al.
Levels and sources of sound in the intensive care unit - an observational study of three room types. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013;57:1041–50.
Drew BJ, Harris P, Zègre-Hemsey JK et al.
Insights into the problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive care unit patients. PLoS One 2014;9:e110274.
Jung S, Kim J, Lee J, Rhee C, Na S, Yoon JH. Assessment of noise exposure and its characteristics in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:4670.
Bennett C, Dudaryk R, Crenshaw N, Edworthy J, McNeer R. Recommendation of new medical alarms based on audibility, identifiability, and detectability in a randomized, simulation-based study. Crit Care Med 2019;47:1050–7.
Murthy VS, Malhotra SK, Bala I, Raghunathan M. Detrimental effects of noise on anaesthetists. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:608–11.
Blomkvist V, Eriksen CA, Theorell T, Ulrich R, Rasmanis G. Acoustics and psychosocial environment in intensive coronary care. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:e1.
Hansell HN. The behavioral effects of noise on man: the patient with “intensive care unit psychosis.” Heart Lung 1984;13:59–65.
Korompeli A, Muurlink O, Kavrochorianou N, Katsoulas T, Fildissis G, Baltopoulos G. Circadian disruption of ICU patients: a review of pathways, expression, and interventions. J Crit Care 2017;38:269–77.
Aurell J, Elmqvist D. Sleep in the surgical intensive care unit: continuous polygraphic recording of sleep in nine patients receiving postoperative care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;290:1029–32.
Xie H, Kang J, Mills GH. Clinical review: the impact of noise on patients’ sleep and the effectiveness of noise reduction strategies in intensive care units. Crit Care 2009;13:208.
Kröller-Schön S, Daiber A, Steven S et al.
Crucial role for Nox2 and sleep deprivation in aircraft noise-induced vascular and cerebral oxidative stress, inflammation, and gene regulation. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3528–39.
Schmidt N, Gerber SM, Zante B et al.
Effects of intensive care unit ambient sounds on healthcare professionals: results of an online survey and noise exposure in an experimental setting. Intensive Care Med Exp 2020;8:34.
Osborne MT, Radfar A, Hassan MZO et al.
A neurobiological mechanism linking transportation noise to cardiovascular disease in humans. Eur Heart J 2020;41:772–82.
Wang S, Yu Y, Feng Y et al.
Protective effect of the orientin on noise-induced cognitive impairments in mice. Behav Brain Res 2016;296:290–300.
Langguth B. A review of tinnitus symptoms beyond 'ringing in the ears': a call to action. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:1635–43.
Jafari MJ, Khosrowabadi R, Khodakarim S, Mohammadian F. The effect of noise exposure on cognitive performance and brain activity patterns. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:2924–31.
Leloup JC, Goldbeter A. Modeling the molecular regulatory mechanism of circadian rhythms in Drosophila
. Bioessays 2000;22:84–93.
Cox CE. Persistent systemic inflammation in chronic critical illness. Respir Care 2012;57:859–64; discussion 864-6.
Cermakian N, Westfall S, Kiessling S. Circadian clocks and inflammation: reciprocal regulation and shared mediators. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2014;62:303–18.
Jobanputra AM, Scharf MT, Androulakis IP, Sunderram J. Circadian disruption in critical illness. Front Neurol 2020;11:820.
Kim DW, Kil HY, White PF. The effect of noise on the bispectral index during propofol sedation. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1170–3.
Stanchina ML, Abu-Hijleh M, Chaudhry BK, Carlisle CC, Millman RP. The influence of white noise on sleep in subjects exposed to ICU noise. Sleep Med 2005;6:423–8.
Khademi G, Roudi M, Shah Farhat A, Shahabian M. Noise pollution in intensive care units and emergency wards. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2011;23:141–8.
Smeulers M, Lucas C, Vermeulen H. Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD009979.
Terzi B, Azizoğlu F, Polat Ş, Kaya N, İşsever H. The effects of noise levels on nurses in intensive care units. Nurs Crit Care 2019;24:299–305.
Lai HL, Lin YP, Chang HK et al.
Intensive care unit staff nurses: predicting factors for career decisions. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:1886–96.
Vahey DC, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Clarke SP, Vargas D. Nurse burnout and patient satisfaction. Med Care 2004;42(Suppl):II57–66.
Nantsupawat A, Srisuphan W, Kunaviktikul W, Wichaikhum OA, Aungsuroch Y, Aiken LH. Impact of nurse work environment and staffing on hospital nurse and quality of care in Thailand. J Nurs Scholarsh 2011;43:426–32.
Kol E, Demircan A, Erdoğan A, Gencer Z, Erengin H. The effectiveness of measures aimed at noise reduction in an intensive care unit. Workplace Health Saf 2015;63:539–45.
Kol E, Aydın P, Dursun O. The effectiveness of environmental strategies on noise reduction in a pediatric intensive care unit: creation of single-patient bedrooms and reducing noise sources. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2015;20:210–7.
Wallis R, Harris E, Lee H, Davies W, Astin F. Environmental noise levels in hospital settings: a rapid review of measurement techniques and implementation in hospital settings. Noise Health 2019;21:200–16.
] [Full text]
Nannapaneni S, Lee SJ, Kashiouris M et al.
Preliminary noise reduction efforts in a medical intensive care unit. Hosp Pract (1995) 2015;43:94–100.
Konkani A, Oakley B, Penprase B. Reducing hospital ICU noise: a behavior-based approach. J Healthc Eng 2014;5:229–46.
Luetz A, Weiss B, Penzel T et al.
Feasibility of noise reduction by a modification in ICU environment. Physiol Meas 2016;37:1041–55.
Hu RF, Jiang XY, Hegadoren KM, Zhang YH. Effects of earplugs and eye masks combined with relaxing music on sleep, melatonin and cortisol levels in ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2015;19:115.
Liu WF; NIC/Q 2005 Physical Environment Exploratory Group. The impact of a noise reduction quality improvement project upon sound levels in the open-unit-design neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2010;30:489–96.
Mattingly AM, Valcin EK. 111: Reduction of ICU noise and alarms with a night-time noise reduction bundle and modified alarm profile. Crit Care Med 2013;41:A21.
Farokhnezhad Afshar P, Bahramnezhad F, Asgari P, Shiri M. Effect of white noise on sleep in patients admitted to a coronary care. J Caring Sci 2016;5:103–9.
Department of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None