Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
Noise & Health  
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded75    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


LITERATURE UPDATE Table of Contents   
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 29  |  Page : 40-41
Medicolegal decision making in noise-induced hearing loss-related tinnitus


Click here for correspondence address and email
How to cite this article:
Dejonckere P H, Lebacq J. Medicolegal decision making in noise-induced hearing loss-related tinnitus. Noise Health 2005;7:40-1

How to cite this URL:
Dejonckere P H, Lebacq J. Medicolegal decision making in noise-induced hearing loss-related tinnitus. Noise Health [serial online] 2005 [cited 2023 Mar 22];7:40-1. Available from: https://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2005/7/29/40/31880
In some patients with occupational noise-induced hearing loss, a significant aspect of the handicap concerns the concomitant tinnitus; thus, this disorder must be considered in evaluating a disability percentage in the insurance context. The main difficulty comes from the lack of objective measures for tinnitus. To reach a maximum of medicolegal objectivity, a system was developed within the Belgian Institute of Occupational Disorders (Brussels) in the form of a four-level decision structure, after exhaustive but noninvasive assessment of patients. An aggregate of multiple-choice responses (affirmative, neutral, negative) to elementary questions leads to a decision of the next level, which in turn determines-together with the other decisions at the same level-the conclusion at a still higher level. A positive outcome on all four level-3 questions is required for recognition of noise-induced hearing loss-related tinnitus as an occupational disorder and for financial compensation (final decision, level 4). We assessed 10 exemplary files on which this system was applied by four experts rating independently. A variant of Cohen's Kappa for multiple raters demonstrated high interrater consistency at the first level. In all cases, the decisions at levels 3 and 4 were identical. In this way, the final medicolegal decision relies on standardized criteria and becomes perfectly transparent.

Correspondence Address:
P H Dejonckere

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions